Relationship between arteriovenous fistula cannulation practices and dialysis adequacy: A prospective, multicenter study


ÖZEN N., AYDIN SAYILAN A., SAYILAN S., Mut D., Akin E. B., Ecder S. T.

Journal of Renal Care, cilt.48, sa.1, ss.41-48, 2022 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 48 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/jorc.12365
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Renal Care
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.41-48
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: arteriovenous fistula, cannulation, dialysis adequacy, haemodialyses
  • Kırklareli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Successful arteriovenous fistula cannulation ensures maximum patient benefit in the haemodialysis procedure. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of various cannulation methods used for arteriovenous fistulas on dialysis adequacy. Design: It is a descriptive, cross-sectional and multicenter study. Participants: A total of 164 dialysis patients from four dialysis centers were included. Measurements: Data were collected by determining patients' characteristics and the arteriovenous fistula cannulation method used, in addition to recording the Kt/V and urea reduction ratio values to evaluate dialysis adequacy. The mean Kt/V and urea reduction ratio values over 3 months after dialysis initiation were used. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04270292. Results: Cannulation with the puncture method was used in 53% of the patients; the fistula needles were inserted in the antegrade direction in 43.9% of the patients; the arterial needle was rotated after fistula needle placement in 63.4% of the patients; and the arterial and venous needles were on the same vascular line in 15.2% of the patients. Placement of the fistula needle in the antegrade direction increased the Kt/V value 0.164 times (95% confidence interval: 0.002–0.212, p =.047). Conclusion: Antegrade placement could be a factor influencing dialysis adequacy. We suggest antegrade interventions to the fistula to maximize the patient benefit from the haemodialysis treatment.