THE GERMANY COPY OF THE FATIHA COMMENTARY ATTRIBUTED TO HAJI BEKTASH VELİ HACI BEKTAŞ VELİYE ATFEDİLEN FATİHA TEFSİRİNİN ALMANYA NÜSHASI
Turk Kulturu ve Haci Bektas Veli - Arastirma Dergisi, sa.118, ss.45-66, 2026 (Scopus, TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.60163/tkhcbva.1823703
- Dergi Adı: Turk Kulturu ve Haci Bektas Veli - Arastirma Dergisi
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Directory of Open Access Journals, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM), MLA International Bibliography
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.45-66
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Commentary, Fatiha Commentary, Haji Bektash Veli, Turkish Language, Tübingen Eberhard Karls University Library Copy
- Kırklareli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
The Sufi movement in Turkistan eventually reached the Anatolian region, and renowned Sufi masters emerged in Anatolia who continued the same tradition. One of them was Haji Bektash Veli. His fame spread throughout both Anatolia and the Balkans. Despite Haji Bektash Veli's widespread fame, our knowledge about his life is extremely limited. Most of the historical information provided about his life is also mixed with legends. There are various works attributed to Haji Bektash Veli, primarily Makalat. One of these works is the Fatiha Commentary. Due to the importance of the sura, many commentary have been made. Three copies of this commentary have been identified as a result of previous research. These are the British Museum Library copy, the Süleymaniye Library Serez copy, and the copy held at the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Atatürk Library. The Fatiha Commentary attributed to Haji Bektash Veli, which is the subject of the research, is contained in a collection registered as Ma.VII.11 at the Eberhard Karls University Library in Tübingen, Germany. The commentary is located between 54b and 66b. The text is provided within a frame, with 11 lines on each page. In the study, the identified manuscript was first transcribed into Latin script. Subsequently, it was compared with previously identified and studied copies. This study aimed to identify the differences and deficiencies between the copies in order to produce a complete copy. As a result, the presence of some language features and archaic elements specific to Old Anatolian Turkish and the presence of sections not found in other copies revealed the importance of the copy.